HyreYard

HyreYard tools

How long should your sprinklers run? Measure the rate, then the minutes are arithmetic

Twenty minutes is not an amount of water. CSU Extension puts spray heads at 1–2½ inches an hour and rotors at ¼–¾, so the same run time can deliver three or four times as much on one zone as another. Measure your rate with six cans in ten minutes, and this does the rest.

6 cans, 10 min and you know your precipitation rate Six straight-sided cans, ten minutes, one ruler: the depth in inches is your rate in inches per hour. The full method is below, and no dataset anywhere holds this number for you.

The short answer, at the defaults. EPA WaterSense’s starting point is "Your landscape will typically require one inch of water a week, including rainfall, and that can vary depending on where you live, recent weather, and the plants in your landscape." Split across two watering days that is half an inch a day. On pop-up spray heads at CSU’s working estimate of 1.75 in/hr that is about 17 minutes a day, twice a week. On rotor heads at 0.5 in/hr the same half inch takes about 60 minutes. Same lawn, same water, three and a half times the run time — which is why a run time copied from anyone else is meaningless.

Then check whether it soaks in. Watch the first run and note the minute water starts to pool or run onto the path. If that happens before the run ends, split it: this tool cuts the run into cycles no longer than your observed runoff time, with start times at least an hour apart, because CSU notes "Generally, the controller is set to cycle again after all the zones have run. If the controller only has a few zones, keep in mind that the start times need to be at least one hour apart."

Why bother. On EPA’s own figures, quoted in full below, overwatering wastes as much as half of all the water American households put on their landscapes. This is a starting point to tune by watching the lawn — not an agronomic prescription. HyreYard does not install or service irrigation.

Your run time, from your rate

Measure the rate first if you can — the six-can test below takes ten minutes. Nothing is sent anywhere and nothing is emailed.

EPA WaterSense starting point is 1 inch a week. If your water district publishes a weekly number for your area, use theirs — it is better than any national figure.

EPA’s inch a week is INCLUDING rainfall, so this is subtracted. A rain gauge in the open is the check.

CSU for Colorado soils: once a week in spring and autumn, twice in summer. Fewer and deeper beats daily.

The depth in the combined can after the six-can ten-minute test. Only used if you chose "Yes" above.

Go and watch one run. This is what drives the cycle-and-soak split — we use your observation rather than a soil table we could not verify.

— Run time
— Cycle and soak schedule
— The arithmetic behind it
— How to fine-tune it
— What this rests on

What this assumed —

A scheduling starting point to tune by watching the lawn, not an agronomic prescription and not a quote. HyreYard does not install, service or design irrigation.

Every watering guide answers the wrong question

Watering guides tell you how often. The number that decides whether your lawn is watered correctly is how fast — and it is different in every garden, and often in every zone of the same garden.

The same twenty minutes, on two common head types22.7%Rotor heads, 20 min (~0.17 in) — 1777.3%Spray heads, 20 min (~0.58 in) — 58Hundredths of an inch applied. CSU Extension GardenNotes #265 working estimates.
HYRE calculation from CSU Extension’s published working estimates (spray 1.75 in/hr, rotor 0.5 in/hr). The instruction "twenty minutes" is identical; the water is not.CSU Extension CMG GardenNotes #265, retrieved 5 September 2026.

The problem with "twenty minutes, twice a week". Twenty minutes is not an amount of water. It is an amount of time, and the water it delivers depends entirely on what is on the end of the pipe. CSU Extension publishes the range: "Pop-up spray heads typically apply 1-2½ inches of water per hour, whereas rotor heads only deliver ¼ to ¾ inch of water per hour." Run the same twenty minutes on each and one zone gets roughly 0.58 inches while the other gets about 0.17 inches. That is not a rounding difference. One of those lawns is being watered roughly three and a half times as hard as the other, off the same instruction.

So the useful number is inches per hour. It is called the precipitation rate, and it is set by head type, brand, water pressure and head spacing together. No national dataset holds it, because it is a fact about your pipework. The good news is that measuring it is genuinely easy: six straight-sided cans, ten minutes, one ruler. The method is below and it is the single highest-value ten minutes available to anyone with an automatic system.

Why this matters beyond the water bill. EPA WaterSense puts US outdoor water use at "nearly 8 billion gallons of water each day, mainly for landscape irrigation", and states that "as much as 50 percent of this water is wasted due to overwatering caused by inefficiencies in irrigation methods and systems". Overwatering is not a marginal inefficiency in this category — on EPA’s own figure it is about half of everything applied. And the damage is not only to the bill: watering too often "Watering plants or grass too frequently can drown plants or result in shallow roots", and pooled water drives "weed growth, disease, fungus, and stormwater runoff that pollutes local waterways".

HyreYard analysis. The reason the wrong question gets asked is that frequency is easy to publish and rate is not. A magazine can print "twice a week" for the whole country. It cannot print your precipitation rate, because it does not know it and neither does any dataset. So the entire genre optimises the variable that does not matter much and ignores the one that does. This calculator inverts that: it will not give you a number until you supply a rate, and it tells you when the rate you supplied is a guess rather than a measurement.

The catch-can test: ten minutes, six cans, one number

The catch-can test is CSU Extension’s procedure, reproduced because it is the whole foundation of the calculator. The arithmetic is done for you by the design of the test — you do not have to convert anything.

  1. 1
    Get six identical straight-sided, flat-bottomed cans

    Soup, fruit or vegetable cans. CSU is explicit about what not to use: "Do not use short cans like tuna cans as they are too shallow, and water may splash out." Many water providers and sod growers hand out calibrated plastic gauges designed for this, and those are better still. You also need a ruler and something to write on.

  2. 2
    Scatter them randomly between the heads, in one zone

    Between the sprinklers, not beside them — you are sampling what the lawn receives, not what a head emits. One zone at a time, because the rate is usually different in each.

  3. 3
    Run the zone for exactly ten minutes

    Time it. Ten minutes is not an approximation here; the arithmetic in step 5 depends on it.

  4. 4
    Pour all six cans into one can and measure the depth

    That depth, in inches, is your precipitation rate in inches per hour. Six cans of ten minutes each is sixty can-minutes, so combining them converts the ten-minute test into an hourly rate with no calculation at all. It is an elegant piece of design and it is why the method uses six cans rather than five or ten.

  5. 5
    Look at the cans before you pour — they are a second, free test

    CSU: "If the amount of water in some containers is significantly more or less than others, the system is poorly designed, or head(s) are malfunctioning." If the depths are wildly uneven, no run time on this page will fix your lawn, because parts of it are being watered several times as hard as others. That is a repair job, not a scheduling job, and it is worth knowing before you spend a season adjusting minutes.

  6. 6
    Repeat for every zone, and write the rates down

    Rates differ zone to zone even with identical heads, because pressure and spacing differ. Once measured, they do not change until you change the hardware — so this is a one-off job whose answer is good for years.

Cycle and soak: split the run at the minute the water stops going in

The second thing that separates a well-watered lawn from a wet pavement, and the one this tool handles differently from every other calculator.

The failure mode. CSU: "On slopes or compacted, clayey soils, water is generally applied faster than it can soak into the soil, resulting in water being wasted as it runs off-site. The cycle and soak approach cuts the irrigation period into multiple short runs with soak-in time in between." EPA says the same thing in consumer language: "Water can easily pool on some landscapes with clay-rich soils or slopes if water is applied too quickly. These landscapes can benefit from dividing irrigation runtimes into intervals with short breaks in between to allow water to soak into the soil." Once water is arriving faster than the ground will take it, every additional minute is not irrigation. It is runoff, and it takes fertiliser and soil with it.

How other calculators handle it, and why we do not. The conventional approach is to look up an infiltration rate from a table keyed to soil texture — sand so many inches per hour, clay so many — and split the run against that. We deliberately do not, and the reason is worth stating plainly: we could not verify such a table in any primary document we actually retrieved. Search results offered one freely. The USDA NRCS server refused automated retrieval on 5 September 2026, and the USDA ARS and UC ANR documents we did read and check do not contain it. Publishing a plausible-looking national table we had not read would have been the easy option and the dishonest one.

What we ask instead, and why it is better anyway. Go and watch the sprinkler, and note the minute at which water first pools or begins to run onto the path. That single observation is what the soil table is a proxy for — and it is a direct measurement of your actual lawn, on your actual slope, with your actual compaction and thatch, at your actual precipitation rate. A table keyed to texture knows none of those things. When you enter that minute, the calculator splits the run into cycles no longer than it, and spaces the start times at least an hour apart, because CSU notes "Generally, the controller is set to cycle again after all the zones have run. If the controller only has a few zones, keep in mind that the start times need to be at least one hour apart."

If nothing pools, nothing needs splitting. Plenty of lawns on free-draining soil absorb a full run without complaint, and adding cycles there is pure complication. Leave the runoff field at zero, watch the first run, and only come back if you see water moving.

Where soil still comes in. Knowing your soil is genuinely useful context, just not as a substitute for watching. A parcel-level lookup of the mapped soil, its drainage class, its hydrologic soil group and its shrink-swell potential. It is free, it takes about five minutes, and it is the cheapest useful thing a homeowner can do before buying hardscape. It is a survey map, not a site investigation of your lot. It will tell you your hydrologic soil group, and group D — "Clays with high shrink-swell, a high water table, a claypan, or shallow soil over near-impervious material." — is a fair warning that you should expect to be cycling.

What half an inch of water costs in minutes, by precipitation rate

HYRE calculation. Half an inch twice a week is the EPA starting point of one inch a week, split across two days. Find your measured rate in the first column; if you have not measured, the two shaded rows are CSU’s published working estimates.

Precipitation rate (in/hr)Minutes for 0.5 inMinutes for 1 inWhat typically runs at this rate
0.25120 min240 minRotors, low end of CSU’s published range
0.5060 min120 minRotor heads — CSU working estimate
0.7540 min80 minRotors, high end of CSU’s published range
1.0030 min60 minSpray heads, low end of CSU’s published range
1.7517 min34 minPop-up spray heads — CSU working estimate
2.5012 min24 minSpray heads, high end of CSU’s published range

Minutes = (inches ÷ rate) × 60, rounded — HYRE calculation. Rate ranges and working estimates are CSU Extension GardenNotes #265, retrieved 5 September 2026. These are whole-run figures; if runoff starts before the run ends, split them into cycles. A measured rate beats every row of this table.

The ways this goes wrong

Ranked by how much water each one wastes, not by how obvious it is.

  • Setting minutes without ever knowing the rate

    The default failure. A number inherited from a neighbour, a previous owner or an installer who set it once. It is not wrong so much as unrelated to your lawn.

  • Running past the point where water stops going in

    Everything after runoff begins is bill and pollution, not irrigation. This is the single biggest avoidable loss on clay and on any slope.

  • Watering little and often

    EPA: "Watering plants or grass too frequently can drown plants or result in shallow roots". Frequent shallow watering keeps roots at the surface, which makes the lawn less able to cope with the first hot week — the opposite of the intended effect.

  • Setting the controller in spring and never touching it

    CSU’s fix is the percent key: run the July–August schedule at 100 percent and drop to "50%, 67% or 100%, based on the season." A spring schedule left running in October waters nothing but the water table.

  • Forgetting that two zones may cover the same ground

    CSU: "In many lawn sections, one zone waters the area from the left while another zone waters the same area from the right. In this situation, cut run times for zones in half, so that each applies half of the needed water." Miss this and the overlap strip gets double, every time.

  • Ignoring rain

    EPA’s inch a week is "including rainfall". A rain sensor does this automatically and CSU notes many states — though not Colorado — require one on automatic systems.

  • Assuming a tuna can is the right can

    For EPA’s simpler half-inch timing method it is fine. For the six-can rate test CSU warns they are too shallow and water splashes out. Use soup cans or proper gauges.

  • Tuning until dry spots never appear

    Counter-intuitive and the most useful line in the CSU document: "In unusually hot weather, if dry spots do not pop up, the lawn is over-watered." A perfectly tuned system shows stress in a heatwave. One that never does is carrying a permanent surplus.

The numbers worth keeping

Each carries its publisher. Nothing here is our own field measurement.

1 ina week including rainfall — the EPA starting point, to be adjusted for where you live and the weatherEPA WaterSense, Watering Tips
8 bngallons a day of US outdoor water use, mainly landscape irrigationEPA WaterSense
50%of it wasted through overwatering and system inefficiency, on EPA’s own figureEPA WaterSense
1–2½ in/hrwhat pop-up spray heads typically applyCSU Extension GardenNotes #265
¼–¾ in/hrwhat rotor heads deliver — three to four times slowerCSU Extension GardenNotes #265
60 minminimum spacing between cycle-and-soak start times on most controllersCSU Extension GardenNotes #265

What this calculator does not know

Stated before you need it.

It does not know your weather. One inch a week is EPA’s starting point, and EPA itself qualifies it: it "can vary depending on where you live, recent weather, and the plants in your landscape." Many water districts publish a weekly watering number for their own service area, updated through the season. If yours does, that number is better than ours and the field is there for you to type it into.

It does not know your grass. CSU’s figures are for cool-season turf such as Kentucky bluegrass and turf-type tall fescue, and the document says plainly that "xeric and dry-land plants may need significantly less water." Warm-season grasses and drought-adapted planting are different problems.

It does not know your soil, and does not pretend to. No infiltration table is used anywhere in this tool, for the reason given above: we could not verify one in a primary source we read. Your observed runoff minute replaces it.

It cannot see a broken system. Uneven cans, a tilted head, a blocked nozzle or a pressure problem all produce a lawn that fails on a perfectly calculated schedule. The audit in step 5 is how you catch that, and it is a repair, not a setting.

It is a starting point, not a prescription. Every method on this page ends the same way in the source material: fine-tune by watching the lawn, in 10 percent steps. The calculator gets you to a sensible first schedule far faster than trial and error, and then the lawn has the final say.

And we do not sell any of this. HyreYard does not install, service or design irrigation, sells no controllers, and takes no fee from anyone who does. That is why this page can tell you to run your system less.

How this calculator works

The published formula is the formula that runs. There is no hidden coefficient and no lookup table anywhere in this tool.

net       = max(0, weekly depth − rain)            inches
zone net  = net ÷ 2  if two zones cover the same ground   (CSU)
           = net      otherwise
per day   = zone net ÷ watering days               inches
rate      = measured catch-can depth               in/hr
           OR 1.75 spray / 0.5 rotor               (CSU working estimates)
run time  = (per day ÷ rate) × 60                  minutes

cycles    = ceil(run time ÷ runoff minute)   if runoff observed
                                              and run time > runoff
           = 1                                otherwise
per cycle = run time ÷ cycles
soak      = at least 60 minutes between start times      (CSU)

Worked, at the defaults. One inch a week, no rain, two watering days, pop-up spray heads: net = 1 in, per day = 0.5 in, rate = 1.75 in/hr, run time = (0.5 ÷ 1.75) × 60 = 17 minutes, twice a week. Switch the head type to rotors at 0.5 in/hr and the same half inch needs (0.5 ÷ 0.5) × 60 = 60 minutes.

Now add an observation: you watch the run and water starts moving onto the path at 8 minutes, and your measured rate is 1.4 in/hr. Run time = (0.5 ÷ 1.4) × 60 = 21 minutes. 21 ÷ 8 = 2.6, rounded up to 3 cycles of 7 minutes, start times an hour apart. Without the split, roughly 0.3 inches would have been applied to ground that had already stopped accepting it.

What each input means

Inputs on this tool, in the order they appear on the form.
InputWhat it is actually asking
Weekly water depth How much water the lawn needs in a week, including rain. EPA WaterSense’s starting point is one inch and it explicitly says this varies by location, recent weather and planting. WHERE TO FIND A BETTER ONE: many water districts and conservation programmes publish a weekly watering number for their own service area, updated through the season — search your district’s name plus "weekly watering". That figure beats any national default, ours included.
Rain this week Rainfall already received, in inches, which is subtracted because EPA’s target is inclusive of it. A cheap rain gauge sited in the open is the honest source; a phone weather app reports the nearest station, which can be miles away and a different shower.
Watering days per week How many days you intend to run the system. CSU’s guidance for Colorado soils is once a week in spring and autumn, twice a week in summer, with the note that watering as infrequently and as deeply as the soil allows gives better resilience in hot spells and suppresses some weeds.
Precipitation rate — measured or estimated Choose measured only if you have actually run the test. The tool changes its own caveats based on this answer, and tells you plainly when the minutes rest on an estimate rather than a measurement.
Measured rate, inches per hour The depth of water in the combined can after the six-can, ten-minute test described in step 4 above. Measure with a ruler. Record it per zone; it does not change until the hardware does.
Head type Used only when you have not measured. Pop-up spray heads are the short fixed fan-shaped sprays; rotors are the ones that sweep back and forth in a stream. CSU publishes 1–2½ in/hr and ¼–¾ in/hr respectively, and we use their working estimates of 1.75 and 0.5. These are starting points and CSU says so.
Minutes until pooling or runoff Stand outside during one run with a phone timer and note when water first pools on the surface or moves onto a path or drive. If it never happens, enter 0 and no cycles are applied. This one observation replaces the soil-infiltration table other calculators use — and it is a measurement of your lawn rather than an average of a soil class.
Overlapping zones Whether the patch you are scheduling is watered by two zones from opposite sides, which is common in narrow strips and around corners. If so CSU’s rule is to halve each zone’s run so that together they apply the intended depth. Look at where the spray from each zone actually lands.

Worked examples

Including one where the naive answer misleads, which is the example most calculators leave out.

The default: spray heads, one inch a week, two days

No rain, two watering days, pop-up spray heads, no runoff observed. The tool returns 17 minutes per watering day, on 2 days a week, as one continuous run. The arithmetic line reads: 1 in to apply over 2 days — 0.5 in per watering day at 1.75 in/hr, based on the CSU working estimate. And the limits line does not let it pass unqualified: you used a head-type estimate, which CSU publishes as a starting point and explicitly says does not account for the actual application rate of your zones. Run the catch-can test before trusting the minutes.

Rotors, same water, three and a half times the clock

Change nothing but the head type. The tool returns 60 minutes per watering day for the identical half inch. This is the single most useful comparison on the page: anyone who copies a neighbour’s "twenty minutes" across a fence between a spray system and a rotor system is out by a factor of three or four in one direction or the other, and will conclude that their lawn or their soil is the problem.

A measured rate plus an observed runoff time

You ran the test and got 1.4 in/hr, and you watched a run and saw water reach the path at 8 minutes. The tool returns 21 minutes per watering day delivered as 3 cycles of 7 minutes each, with at least 60 minutes between start times, and explains why: a single run of 21 minutes would put roughly 0.3 in onto a surface that had already stopped accepting it. Programme three start times, not one long one.

Rain does the job for you

Weekly target one inch, and 1.2 inches of rain has fallen. The tool returns No irrigation needed this week and tells you to switch the controller off rather than let it run into wet soil, citing EPA on what frequent watering into saturated ground actually does — drowned plants, shallow roots, and pooling that drives weeds, disease, fungus and polluted runoff. This is the case a set-and-forget controller gets wrong every time it rains.

What changes the result

What actually moves the answer, ranked.

1. The precipitation rate. Nothing else is close. It is a straight divisor on the run time, and the plausible range across common domestic hardware — CSU’s ¼ to 2½ in/hr — spans a factor of ten. Every other input adjusts the answer; this one sets it.

2. The weekly depth. Linear, and the input most worth localising. Swapping our national one-inch default for your own district’s published weekly figure is the single best improvement you can make to this calculation.

3. The runoff observation. Changes not how much water is applied but whether it arrives in the soil or on the pavement. On clay and on slopes it is the difference between the schedule working and the schedule being theatre.

4. Rain. Subtracted directly, and capable of taking the answer to zero. Chronically ignored by controllers without a rain sensor.

5. Watering days. Divides the same weekly total into more or fewer sessions. It changes root behaviour more than it changes the water bill.

6. Zone overlap. A halving switch. Binary, easy to miss, and doubles the water on the overlap strip when missed.

What is deliberately absent.

No soil infiltration table. The conventional driver of cycle-and-soak, omitted because we could not verify one in a primary document we actually read on 5 September 2026. Your observed runoff minute replaces it and is a better measurement anyway.

No evapotranspiration model. The topic plan called for county gridded ET. We did not ship it: it answers a less binding question than the precipitation rate, and it cannot be verified by the reader standing in their own garden. Your water district’s weekly number is the local adjustment, from a body that measured it.

No grass-species coefficients. CSU’s figures are for cool-season turf, and it notes xeric and dry-land plants may need significantly less. We do not publish crop coefficients we have not individually sourced.

No cost or savings figure. Water rates vary by district and tier, and an invented saving would be the least defensible number on the page. Priced separately, at your own rate off your own bill, on the lawn water cost calculator.

Local considerations

Your district probably publishes the number you want. Water providers and conservation programmes across the country publish weekly watering guidance for their own service area, often updated through the season from local weather. Where that exists it is strictly better than a national inch-a-week default, and the calculator has a field for it. This is also why the page is built to be embedded: the arithmetic is universal, the weekly number is local, and the two should come from different places.

Soil, as context rather than as a coefficient. A parcel-level lookup of the mapped soil, its drainage class, its hydrologic soil group and its shrink-swell potential. It is free, it takes about five minutes, and it is the cheapest useful thing a homeowner can do before buying hardscape. It is a survey map, not a site investigation of your lot. Hydrologic soil group D — "Clays with high shrink-swell, a high water table, a claypan, or shallow soil over near-impervious material." — is fair warning to expect cycling. Group A — "Deep sands and gravelly sands. Water goes down." — usually is not. We use this to set expectations, never to compute a number.

Rules that are genuinely local. Watering-day restrictions, permitted hours, drought stages and rain-sensor requirements are set by state and district and change during a drought. CSU notes many states, though not Colorado, require rain shut-off sensors on automatic systems. Check your own provider before assuming a schedule is allowed.

When not to use this

Do not use it on a system whose cans filled unevenly. That is a hardware fault and no run time resolves it — you would only be choosing which parts of the lawn to sacrifice.

Do not use it for drip irrigation, bubblers or hand watering. Drip is measured in gallons per hour per emitter, not inches per hour over an area, and the arithmetic here does not apply.

Do not use it for new seed or new sod. Establishment watering is frequent and shallow by design — the opposite of everything on this page — and it is a horticultural decision, not a scheduling one.

Do not use it for warm-season grasses or drought-adapted planting without adjusting the weekly depth. CSU’s figures are for cool-season turf and the document says xeric and dry-land plants may need significantly less.

Do not treat the output as permission. Drought restrictions and watering-day rules override any calculator, including this one.

And do not treat it as a prescription. Every source on this page ends the same way: tune by watching the lawn, in 10 percent steps. HyreYard does not install, service or design irrigation, sells no controllers, and takes no fee from anyone who does.

Related on this site

Questions this calculator answers

How long should I run my sprinklers?
Long enough to apply the depth of water your lawn needs, which depends entirely on how fast your sprinklers apply water. EPA WaterSense suggests about one inch a week including rainfall as a starting point. At CSU Extension’s working estimate of 1.75 in/hr for pop-up spray heads, half an inch takes about 17 minutes; at 0.5 in/hr for rotors, the same half inch takes about 60 minutes. Measure your own rate with the six-can test on this page and the minutes stop being a guess.
How do I measure my sprinkler precipitation rate?
CSU Extension’s method: place six identical straight-sided, flat-bottomed cans randomly between the heads in one zone, run the zone for exactly ten minutes, pour all six cans into one, and measure the depth with a ruler. That depth in inches is your precipitation rate in inches per hour — six cans of ten minutes is sixty can-minutes, so the test converts itself. Do not use tuna cans; CSU warns they are too shallow and water splashes out. Repeat per zone, because the rate differs zone to zone.
How much water does a lawn need per week?
EPA WaterSense: "Your landscape will typically require one inch of water a week, including rainfall, and that can vary depending on where you live, recent weather, and the plants in your landscape." Treat one inch as a starting point rather than a rule. Many water districts publish a weekly watering figure for their own service area that updates through the season, and where one exists it is better than any national number — including ours.
What is cycle and soak, and do I need it?
It means splitting one long run into several short ones with soak-in time between. You need it when water is arriving faster than your ground will take it. CSU: "On slopes or compacted, clayey soils, water is generally applied faster than it can soak into the soil, resulting in water being wasted as it runs off-site." The test is direct — watch the run and see whether water pools or moves. If it never does, you do not need cycles and adding them is pure complication.
How do I know how many cycles to use?
This tool takes the minute at which you observed runoff beginning and splits the total run into cycles no longer than that, then spaces the start times at least an hour apart, per CSU. Most calculators instead look up an infiltration rate from a soil-texture table. We deliberately do not, because we could not verify such a table in any primary source we actually read on 5 September 2026 — and because your observed runoff minute is a direct measurement of your own soil, slope, compaction and rate, which a texture table only approximates.
Should I water every day?
Generally no. EPA notes watering too frequently "can drown plants or result in shallow roots". CSU’s guidance for Colorado soils is once a week in spring and autumn and twice a week in summer, with the observation that "watering as infrequently and deeply as the soil allows gives better resilience during hot spells and helps reduce many weed species." Fewer, longer waterings — split into cycles if they run off — beat daily sprinkles.
What time of day should I water?
CSU: "Many water providers encourage homeowners to water their yards between 9 p.m. and 9 a.m. Winds are typically less at night, and evaporation loss will be lower." Wind is the underrated half of that — it distorts the spray pattern as well as evaporating the water, so a windy midday run is uneven as well as wasteful.
How do I know if I am overwatering?
CSU gives a test most people find backwards: "In unusually hot weather, if dry spots do not pop up, the lawn is over-watered." A precisely tuned system should show some stress in a genuine heatwave. If yours never does, it is carrying a permanent surplus. The signal to water is colour shifting from bluish-green to grey-blue, with footprints still visible an hour or more later.
Two of my zones water the same strip. Does that matter?
Yes, and it is easy to miss. CSU: "In many lawn sections, one zone waters the area from the left while another zone waters the same area from the right. In this situation, cut run times for zones in half, so that each applies half of the needed water." There is a switch for this in the calculator. Without it, the overlap strip gets double every single time.
My catch cans filled very unevenly. What does that mean?
That the problem is not your schedule. CSU: "If the amount of water in some containers is significantly more or less than others, the system is poorly designed, or head(s) are malfunctioning." No run time fixes uneven distribution — you would be choosing between drowning the wet parts and starving the dry ones. Check for tilted or blocked heads, mismatched nozzles and pressure problems first.
Do I need to change the schedule through the season?
Yes, and it is the single biggest easy saving. CSU’s approach uses the percent key on the controller: set it for the July–August schedule, then run at "50%, 67% or 100%, based on the season". A spring setting left running into autumn waters nothing useful. Fine-tune in 10 percent increments rather than large jumps.
Does this tool know my local evapotranspiration?
No, and it says so rather than implying otherwise. The original plan for this page called for county-level gridded reference ET. We did not ship that: it would have to be frozen into the page, and more importantly it answers a question that is not the binding one. The number that actually sets your run time is your own precipitation rate, which no national dataset holds. Where your water district publishes a weekly watering figure, type it into the weekly-depth field — that is the local adjustment, from the body that measured it.

Sources and methodology

Figures dated 5 September 2026. Last reviewed .

  • Watering Tips (US Environmental Protection Agency, WaterSense, retrieved 2026-09-05. Source of the one-inch-a-week including-rainfall starting point, the tuna-can timing method, the cycle-and-soak guidance for clay soils and slopes, and the overwatering consequences quoted on this page.)
  • WaterSense outdoor water use (US Environmental Protection Agency, retrieved 2026-09-05. The ~8 billion gallons a day figure and the statement that as much as 50 percent is wasted through overwatering and system inefficiency.)
  • CMG GardenNotes #265, Methods to Schedule Home Lawn Irrigation (Colorado State University Extension, retrieved 2026-09-05. Read in full. Source of the spray 1–2½ in/hr and rotor ¼–¾ in/hr ranges and their working estimates, the six-can ten-minute catch-can procedure, the uniformity warning, the overlapping-zone halving rule, the one-hour minimum between cycle start times, the 10 percent tuning increments, the 50/67/100 percent seasonal key and the dry-spots test for overwatering. Authors: David Whiting (retired); revised September 2017 by Kurt M. Jones; reviewed April 2023 by Marvin Reynolds.)
  • Web Soil Survey (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, retrieved 2026-09-05. Free parcel-level lookup of mapped soil and hydrologic soil group. Cited as useful context for whether to expect runoff — not used as a source of infiltration rates, which we could not verify.)
  • Simple Irrigation Audit for Home Lawns in Oklahoma (Oklahoma State University Extension, retrieved 2026-09-05. Listed because it is a good second reference for the audit method for readers who want one. RETRIEVAL NOTE: the server returned HTTP 403 to automated retrieval on 5 September 2026, so nothing on this page is quoted from it or sourced to it.)

Related

  • Irrigation systems Where the efficiency actually comes from: zoning by plant need, a sensor and a schedule.
  • Lawn water cost calculator The other half of this question. Take the depth you land on here and it prices the gallons at your own utility rate — including the tier and sewer traps that make irrigation cost more than the headline rate.
  • Turf rebate If the honest answer is less lawn rather than better scheduling, this prices the swap at your own utility rate.
  • Drainage diagnostic If water is pooling when the sprinklers are off, the problem is drainage, not run time.
  • Landscaping cost estimator If irrigation is one line in a bigger project budget.
  • Mulch calculator Mulched beds hold moisture and need a different schedule from turf.

Find a Landscaping Company Back to the homepage