Buying it as a lawn product
The comparison that decides the outcome is not between two turf products, it is between two base specifications. Everything that goes wrong structurally with installed turf is underneath it.
Landscaping services
Artificial turf is sold as a lawn product and built like a patio. Underneath the visible surface is a compacted subgrade, a compacted aggregate base and a drainage path, and almost every complaint about installed turf — ponding, settlement, wrinkles, seams opening, odour — is a failure in one of those rather than in the turf itself. Judge a turf quote the way you would judge a paving quote: by what it says about the layers you will never see.
HyreYard is not a landscaping company. We plant nothing, grade nothing, build no wall, cut no tree and pull no permit. This page explains the work so you can read a proposal and judge the company that wrote it.
Turf failures are as diagnostic as paver failures, and for the same reason: the surface is flexible and it reports what the base beneath it is doing.
Artificial turf is normally quoted against one alternative that has been chosen for it. These are the real options, and they answer different questions.
| Artificial turf | A synthetic surface on a compacted base. No irrigation, no mowing, no fertiliser. A base-and-drainage job to install, an ongoing rinse-and-groom job to maintain, and a replacement at the end of a cycle. |
|---|---|
| Living lawn, watered efficiently | The option that is skipped fastest in a turf conversation. WaterSense attributes a large share of outdoor water use to irrigation inefficiency rather than to lawns as such, which means a controller, a schedule and a repaired system change the numbers substantially without removing anything. |
| A more suitable grass | Replacing a species that is wrong for the climate with one that is right for it. Cheaper than turf, keeps the living surface, and addresses the actual cause where the complaint is a struggling lawn rather than a lawn as such. |
| Planting, mulch and low-water beds | Converting lawn to planted area rather than to a surface. Frequently the option water utility rebate programmes are actually written for, and frequently the one with the better outcome for shade, soil and habitat. |
| Hardscape | A patio, a path or a gravel area. It has a published base specification of its own and it is impervious, which makes drainage a design requirement rather than an afterthought. EPA: “much of the land surface is covered by buildings, pavement and compacted landscapes. These surfaces do not allow rain and snow melt to soak into the ground which greatly increases the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff” |
A turf quote produced from a square footage and a product name has priced the surface. These are the things that decide the installation.
Eight steps, and the first five are the ones that decide the outcome. By the time the turf is rolled out, the installation has already succeeded or failed.
Stripping the existing surface and excavating to the depth of the base plus the turf. Like any hardscape excavation, the spoil volume is larger than it looks and it has to leave the property.
Establishing the fall and deciding where water goes. Surface fall away from buildings, and where the ground below does not drain, a designed subsurface path rather than an assumption that the base will cope.
The excavated ground is compacted before any stone goes on it. This is the same step a paver patio takes for the same reason: a base built on loose ground settles regardless of how well the base itself is compacted. ICPI specifies 98% of standard Proctor density, ASTM D698 for pedestrian paving, which is the nearest published analogue to this work.
Aggregate placed and compacted in layers rather than in one dump. ICPI’s paving guidance places base in lifts of 4 to 6 inches, each compacted before the next, and the logic transfers directly: aggregate compacts from the top, so a deep single lift is not a compacted base.
A finer compacted layer screeded flat, because every irregularity in it reads through the turf exactly as an uneven base reads through pavers, and a separation or weed layer where the system uses one.
Rolling the material out, letting it relax, aligning the fibre direction consistently across every piece, then seaming and stretching before fixing. Seams and fibre direction are the two things that make an installation look deliberate or look patched.
Securing every edge against a restraint or into the base. Edges that are not restrained lift, curl and catch, and it is the same failure mode as a patio spreading at its perimeter.
Infill brushed into the pile at the specified rate, then the surface groomed to stand the fibre up. Infill is not decorative: it ballasts the material, holds the blades upright and affects how the surface handles liquid.
EPA WaterSense publishes figures about outdoor household water use. They are the strongest sourced numbers in this conversation, and they are about irrigation rather than about turf. Read them for what they say.
| Outdoor use | WaterSense: American households use “nearly 8 billion gallons of water each day, mainly for landscape irrigation” — that is roughly 8 billion gallons a day nationally. |
|---|---|
| How much of it is wasted | WaterSense: “as much as 50 percent of this water is wasted due to overwatering caused by inefficiencies in irrigation methods and systems” |
| Scale, for context | The average American household uses more water outdoors than it uses for showering and washing clothes combined. |
| What that does prove | Outdoor irrigation is a large use of household water and a large share of it is wasted through inefficiency. Anything that reduces irrigated area or improves irrigation efficiency reduces that use. |
| What it does not prove | It does not tell you how much water any particular turf installation saves. That depends on what you were irrigating, how efficiently, in what climate. We hold no dataset of turf installations and publish no saving figure. |
| The comparison that is usually skipped | Much of the waste WaterSense describes is caused by inefficiency rather than by lawns existing. A controller, a corrected schedule and a repaired system change the number without removing anything, which makes "efficient lawn" a real option in the comparison rather than a rhetorical one. |
| Where the money arithmetic lives | Rebate terms are set by individual water utilities and vary by programme, material and square footage. Ours is on the turf rebate tool, against the programmes recorded on turf rebate programs. Check that synthetic turf is eligible where you are — several programmes fund planted conversions only. |
Read a turf quote the way you would read a paving quote, because it is one. The product name, the pile height and the colour are the part you can compare on a website; the list below is the part that decides whether the surface is flat and dry in five years, and it is invisible the day it is finished.
The buried-work argument on the base specification applies to this work in full. The published numbers there are ICPI’s, written for interlocking concrete pavement rather than for turf, and we cite them as the nearest verified analogue rather than as a turf standard — no comparable published figure for synthetic turf base construction was available to us.
Turf is priced per square foot, which hides the fact that the excavation, the base and the disposal are a large share of the job and have nothing to do with which product you chose.
| Factor | Why it changes the number |
|---|---|
| Square footage | The headline, and the least variable per unit. Measure it yourself before anyone quotes. |
| Excavation depth and disposal | Stripping an existing lawn and digging to base depth produces a large volume of material that leaves by truck and is tipped for a fee. Frequently the most underestimated line in the quote. |
| Base depth and soil | Deeper base on poor-draining ground means more aggregate, more excavation and more disposal, and the three move together. |
| Drainage work | Where the ground below will not take water, a designed subsurface path with an outlet. This is a drainage job inside a turf job and it should be priced as one. |
| Access | Whether a machine reaches the work. Wheelbarrowing aggregate and carrying rolls through a side gate is a large labour line on a small area. |
| Product | Pile height, fibre type, density and backing. The line you can shop, and the one with the least influence on whether the installation stays flat. |
| Infill type and rate | A real material cost and a real quality variable, and the one most often left unnamed so that two quotes cannot be compared on it. |
| Shape, cuts and obstacles | Curves, trees, beds and paths all generate cutting, seaming and waste. A complex shape uses more material than its area suggests. |
| Edges and restraint | What the perimeter is fixed to. Where there is no existing hard edge, one has to be built. |
| Aggregate compaction allowance | Loose delivered stone compacts down. Our own planning allowance is +20%, and it is editorial — Compaction is a real volume change and ICPI requires the base to reach 98% of standard Proctor density. The ratio between the loose volume you buy and the compacted volume you end up with depends on gradation, moisture and the compactor, and there is no published national figure for "crushed stone". Twenty percent is our planning allowance, not a measurement of your quarry. |
| The replacement cycle | Turf is not a permanent surface. It wears, it fades, and eventually it is removed and replaced. We publish no lifespan figure because we hold no sourced one, but a lifetime-cost comparison that ignores the cycle is not a comparison. |
HyreYard publishes no average price for this work and holds no dataset of landscaping invoices. Access, soil, grade, regional labour and material availability move the number far enough that a single figure would mislead more than it helped.
Read a turf quote as a base quote. Two turf installations using identical product can differ enormously in price and both be honest, and the difference is underneath: how deep the excavation went, how the subgrade was compacted, how thick the base is, in how many lifts it was placed, and what happens to water that passes through the surface. None of it shows in a photograph and none of it shows in year one. If the quote names a product, a pile height and a square-foot price but says nothing about excavation depth, base thickness, compaction, fall or drainage, ask for all five in writing before comparing anything.
Work through the rebate arithmetic for your own square footage
The full ten-point checklist is on choosing a landscaping company, and the lines a comparable bid contains are on reading a landscaping estimate.
The comparison that decides the outcome is not between two turf products, it is between two base specifications. Everything that goes wrong structurally with installed turf is underneath it.
Turf backing passes water; the ground below may not. On a slow-draining soil, water passing through the surface arrives at a base with nowhere to go, and the area ponds from beneath.
Aggregate compacts from the top. The same reason ICPI places paving base in 4 to 6 inch lifts applies here, and a deep single dump keeps settling for years — visibly, because the surface above it is flexible.
Every dip and ridge in the screeded layer reads through the surface, exactly as ICPI describes unevenness reflecting through a paver field. A flexible surface hides nothing.
Synthetic fibre has a direction and it catches light differently along it. Pieces laid at odds with each other produce visible panels that no amount of grooming resolves.
Infill ballasts the material and holds the blades upright under traffic. A quote that says "infill included" without naming the material or the rate cannot be compared to one that does.
Edges that are not fixed to something lift and curl, and the failure propagates inward. It is the same category of omission as leaving the edge restraint off a patio.
It is lower-maintenance, not no-maintenance. Grooming, rinsing, clearing debris, topping up infill and dealing with windblown weed seed in the infill are all real ongoing tasks.
A synthetic surface in full afternoon sun gets substantially hotter than living grass. We publish no temperature figure because we hold no measured data, but this is a known property, it is not a defect, and no installer can fix it afterwards.
Turf has a replacement cycle and the material comes out at the end of it. Any comparison against a living lawn that treats the surface as a one-time cost is comparing the wrong things.
Removing irrigated lawn removes the irrigation that went with it, so directionally yes — but we are not going to publish a number, because the honest answer depends entirely on what you were irrigating, how efficiently and in what climate, and we hold no dataset of turf installations. What is sourced is the size of the problem: EPA WaterSense reports that American households use “nearly 8 billion gallons of water each day, mainly for landscape irrigation” and that “as much as 50 percent of this water is wasted due to overwatering caused by inefficiencies in irrigation methods and systems” Read that second figure carefully, because it changes the decision: a large share of outdoor water use is lost to inefficiency rather than to lawns existing. A properly scheduled controller and a repaired system address a meaningful part of it without removing anything, which makes the efficient-lawn option a real alternative that deserves a quote of its own rather than a rhetorical dismissal.
We do not publish a figure, because we have no sourced one and the numbers circulating in the industry are manufacturer marketing rather than independent measurement. What we will say is that the cycle is real: turf wears where it is walked, it fades in sun, the fibre lies down in traffic lanes, and at some point it is removed and replaced. That has two consequences worth planning for. First, any cost comparison against a living lawn has to account for replacement or it is comparing a one-time cost to an ongoing one. Second, ask what happens to the material at the end — whether the installer takes it back, whether it is recyclable where you live, or whether it goes to landfill. That is a reasonable question and the answer varies by region.
Yes, in direct sun, and noticeably hotter than living grass, which cools itself by transpiring. We are not going to publish a temperature figure because we hold no measured data and the numbers vary enormously with sun angle, air temperature, product and infill. What matters practically is that it is a property of the material rather than an installation defect, no installer can remove it, and it is worth evaluating before you buy rather than after. If the area is south-facing and used in the afternoon by children or dogs, stand on an installed piece in similar conditions before deciding. Shade, whether from a tree, a structure or the orientation of the space, changes the experience substantially.
Infill is granular material brushed down into the pile between the fibres, and it does three jobs: it ballasts the turf so it stays where it was fixed, it supports the blades so they stand upright rather than matting under traffic, and depending on the material it affects how liquid moves through the system — which matters a great deal where pets use the surface. It is not optional on a normal installation and it is not a detail. It is also the line most frequently left unnamed in a quote, which conveniently makes two quotes impossible to compare. Ask for the material by name and the application rate, and ask how often it needs topping up, because infill migrates and depletes over time.
It is the job. Artificial turf is a flexible surface, which means it reports faithfully everything the layers below it do: a dished area in the base shows through as a dip, an uneven levelling course shows through as a ripple, and a base with nowhere to send water shows up as ponding. This is exactly the same relationship a paver patio has with its base, and ICPI states the principle directly for paving — unevenness in the bedding layer reflects through to the surface over time. We cite ICPI’s published figures on this page as the nearest verified analogue, not as a synthetic turf standard; no comparable published specification for turf base construction was available to us. The practical test stands regardless: ask for excavation depth, subgrade compaction, base thickness, lift thickness and fall, in writing, and compare quotes on those.
Sometimes, and the terms are entirely local. Turf replacement rebates are run by individual water utilities and water districts rather than nationally, and they differ on almost every variable that matters: the rate per square foot, the maximum area, whether you have to apply and be inspected before starting, what the replacement has to consist of, and critically whether synthetic turf qualifies at all. A number of programmes are written for planted, low-water conversions and specifically exclude synthetic surfaces, on the grounds that the aim is living landscape rather than an impervious one. Check your own utility before you sign anything, and run the arithmetic on the turf rebate tool against what we could verify on turf rebate programs.
Less than a lawn, and more than nothing, and the gap between "low-maintenance" and "maintenance-free" is where most disappointment lives. Expect to clear leaves and debris so the surface drains and the fibre is not smothered, brush or groom the pile to stand it up in traffic areas, top up infill as it depletes and migrates, rinse the surface where pets use it, and remove weeds that germinate from windblown seed in the infill rather than from underneath. None of that is onerous, but it is a routine, and a system that is never rinsed or groomed ages faster and looks it. Ask the installer what they expect of you and how often, and check whether any of it is a condition of the warranty.
Not in the sense a patio is — the backing is designed to let water through, either through perforations or as a fully permeable construction — but the question that matters is what happens underneath. Water that passes through the surface arrives at a compacted aggregate base on a compacted subgrade, and if that ground does not accept water, the water has to be led somewhere by design. On a free-draining soil that is often straightforward. On a slow-draining one it is a drainage job, with a collection path and an outlet, priced as part of the installation. This is worth settling early because the EPA is describing the same mechanism when it notes that buildings, pavement and compacted landscapes do not allow rain and snow melt to soak into the ground, which greatly increases the volume and velocity of stormwater runoff. A compacted base is a compacted landscape, whatever is lying on top of it.
Information on this page is general and varies by climate, soil, grade, construction and local code. It is not horticultural, arboricultural or engineering advice, and a local building department, water utility or homeowners association can impose requirements that take precedence over anything written here. HyreYard is an independent landscaping resource and connection platform, not a landscaping company, and does not perform, supervise, inspect or warrant any outdoor work.
Tell us about the yard and your zip code. Free, and no obligation to hire anyone.